Wednesday, June 19, 2019
BUSINESS LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words
BUSINESS LAW - Essay ExampleIn case an individual is claimed with the tort of negligence, it makes it evident that a individual has been not able to translate careful act which must have caused harm to the other person in terms of property or other. It should be note that the negligence tort has been long debated for different kinds of cases which have been posed against professionals over the time. It is highly necessary for the claimant to prove that the person who has been charged with the negligence tort has provided no care of art within certain circumstances which ultimately caused him or her to lose property or any other damages. Herein, it is significant to understand the history of negligence tort. It was noted about 100 years ago, Man is entitled to be as negligent as he pleases towards the whole world if he owes no traffic to them1. This is quiet an effective ground on which the tort of negligence can be well understood. By carefully interpreting this quotation, it be comes easier to note that a person is probable to show negligence towards his concern. In case there are damages noted as a result of the negligence towards the duty thusly it is suggested that the person may be claimed against. There are basically three situations which should be marked in case there is a reporting of a case claiming an individual to be negligent regarding his duty. Initially, it should be well proven that in case the duty was performed effectively then it would have helped in the caoutchouc of the property or any other damage bearer. Also, there needs to be a clear definition regarding the relationship mingled with the claimants and defendants who were involved in the case2. It should be noted that there were a number of situations which were testes when the tort was practiced in a number of cases of negligence. One of the most effective yet history-making cases was between Donoghue v Stevenson 1932UKHL 100. As per the case rulings, a snail was found in an opa que gingerroot beer bottle which was being produced by the corporation of Stevenson. The consumption of the ginger beer was done Donoghue where the damage was noted to be extreme shock and abdominal pain. It was marked the Donoghue sued Stevenson for risking the life of customers. As a result of the claim, it was demanded that the food/beverage company owned by Stevenson must pay a handsome amount for the pain caused. The ruling provided by the judges on the case presented a juvenile dimension to the tort of negligence and liability. The landmark case of Donoghue v Stevenson was marked to testify the neighbor principal whether there is a need of determination against the duty of care held for the purpose of damages3. Other than the cases of negligence, there can be various situations where one needs to bring surety of the statements as provided in the shape of advice. It has been widely noted that many financial agents would provide information based on mere discussions and not t ruth/facts. Such an example of negligent misstatement has been posed in the case of Hedley Byrne v Heller (1963). As the information posed, Hedley, the firm needed relevant information regarding Easipower for sanctioning credit4. It is for this purpose that Hedley asked Heller5 to provide necessary information. As a result, it was marked that credit was provided to Easipower. With the passage of time, it was noted that Easipower was going out of the business because there were increased
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.